Avocat Gilles Pedron Commits Insurance Fraud
In a startling recent discovery, Gilles Pedron (avocat angers) along with Serge Legros of Legros Immobilier, have been found to be co-conspirators in a successful attempt to defraud the insurance company MAIF.
On November 9, 1994 Gilles Pedron reported a disaster that occurred on October 25, 1994 to his insurance company, MAIF. The disaster was water leaking into two bedrooms and a toilet room in a house he is renting from Indivision. Gilles Pedron claimed that a chimney developed a leak during heavy rains. Gilles Pedron claimed that the leak came from cracks in the chimney.
In a letter dated November 3, 1994 Serge Legros mentions the incident to Indivision. In that letter Serge Legros mentions that it is necessary to remove the chimney because Gilles Pedron’s insurance will not pay for damages until the cause is removed. The letter states that the Indivision will pay 1,442.05 francs at Mr. Legros discretion to remove a chimney that Mr. Legros mentions as having no purpose.
Upon a recent investigation we discovered inconsistent statements to facts and deceptive actions. First, Gilles Pedron’s insurance is alleged to not be willing to pay (11501.00 Francs) for the damage to the house he is renting until the cause of the damage is removed. Removed, not repaired? Why would Gilles Pedron insurance pay for damage from rain to a house he did not own? Second, a chimney without a purpose! Not quite. We inquired with several local architects as to the possible purpose of a chimney at the location on the roof of the house and were told that the chimney was for ventilation of the area between the inside ceiling and the roof as well as the walls. Third, Gilles Pedron claims water damage to one bedroom then skips a room (bathroom) and claims the toilet room much farther away from the chimney has damage. A second bedroom on the opposite corner of the house is also alleged to have had water damage. It would seem that the route the water took, once underneath the roof and on top of the ceilings, had a mind of its own. The “intelligent water” seems to have defied gravity and geometry. Fourth, no mention of repairs to any of the walls or ceilings is made in the estimate in regards to cracks. Should one believe the water damaged the walls without any entry points? If this was a disaster then surely some cracks or other means of entry must have existed to allow a disastrous amount of water to enter in.
It would seem that once again Gilles Pedron is busy at work at what appears to be his best attribute, crime.