Court in Saumur Implicates Government
in Illegal Conduct
In the ongoing issue of Pedron-Landreau verses Indivision judge Valerie de Larminat, Tribunal d’Instance de Saumur, handed down a ruling based on falsehoods and lies. It is felt by sources close to the issue that the bogus ruling is another indication of Freemason involvement.
Judge de Larminat has fabricated a lie. She appears to pretend that a particular member of the indivision has and had no valid mailing address. Based on the alleged absence of valid address she decided not to accept the testimony and evidence of that individual. Curiously the evidence and testimony clearly exposed Pedron-Landreau for criminal conduct. Furthermore, on the date of the court hearing the judge and inspector general carried out an illegal activity planned on intimidating the member of the indivision in question. Gendarmes illegally removed the owner and her husband from the courthouse, against their will just as the court session was to start. They were made to wait for an unreasonable amount of time without explanation until finally confronted with an individual who claimed to be the inspector general. Wild accusations were made about threatening electronic internet messages. About what and to whom was never indicated. They were finally released but not until after the court case was heard. During this time Herve Lenoir, lawyer-representing the owner, was found to be a co-conspirator in the illegal activity put forth by the government officials mentioned herein. Presently the owner has denounced him but the legal professionals in Nantes where he is a member of the bar are protecting him from guilt.
Judge de Larminat, however, has committed a grievous mistake. Through her reckless act she has implicated the French government as a partner in crime.